Gita and Gandhiji
Book Specification
Item Code: | UAM851 |
Author: | Dr. Ramesh S. Betai |
Publisher: | National Gandhi Museum |
Language: | English |
Edition: | 2002 |
ISBN: | 8121207991 |
Pages: | 330 |
Cover: | HARDCOVER |
Other Details | 8.90 X 5.90 inch |
Weight | 550 gm |
Book Description
Dr. Betai has shown in chapter ten that Gandhiji is a Bhashyakara on the Gita and as such he should find a proper place among the Bhashyakaras. To interpret all the 700 verses without being inconsistent as regards the interpretation of each single verse with the rest of the Gita is not a small thing. Even in Shri Shankaracharya, we find inconsistencies. To illustrate, Shankara takes Shri Krishna as his Saguna or comparatively real Principle throughout his interpretation of the Gita, but the same Acharya, while interpreting Gita XIV: 26 27, gives an interpretation in which he takes Krishna as the Nirguna or absolute Reality. But Dr. Betai's interpretation of the Gita clarifies to show that though Gandhiji follows the method of a Bhashyakara in understanding and interpreting the Gita, he is thoroughly consistent in his stand.
Dr. Betai has also shown how Gandhiji remarkably differed from Tilak, Radhakrishnan and others on the Gira. In the opinion of Tilak, Himsa as also Asatya (Telling a lie) would be possible to be committed without any selfish purpose. But Gandhiji held that such actions as killing, telling a lie, deceiving somebody etc., are never possible if a man is totally unselfish, totally Anasakta, as the Gita would tell in his opinion. Gandhiji holds that even if a man commits an act of killing even while working for the good of others or for the benefit of a nation or humanity that he loveser adores, his act of killing is selfish or done with asakti. Looking to our modern times, Gandhiji seems to be undoubtedly right, because we should, in our behavior, look upon the whole world (and not only India) as our (or 'my) world, otherwise, one nation guided by its one disinterested leader would deeply harm another nation and would say that he has no self-interest. This viewpoint of Gandhiji has been brought out by Dr. Betai in his Chapters on Gandhiji's Interpretation of the Gita (Chapters 4 and 5).
In Chapters 6 to 9 Dr. Betai has collected all material from Gandhiji's other works to show how Gandhiji understood the bhavartha, the spirit, of the Gita, as distinguished from the shabdartha or the word, the verbal sense of the Gila. Thus, Dr. Betai has found that Gandhiji traced his Spining Wheel doctrine from Gita (Shreyan svadharmo vigunah paradharmat svanushthitat Svadharme nidhanam shreyah paradharmo bhayavahah). Gandhiji stated that dharma in the Gita means that which would save the economic and spiritual life of a nation, and according to Gandhiji, the Spinning Wheel would save the economic and spiritual life not only of India but of the whole world. The Spinning Wheel is meant by the Gita's dharma, for the present world.
Dr. Betai gathers information from Gandhiji's works (other than his comments on the Gita) to show Gandhiji's fight against untouch ability. Gandhiji depended upon Gita (Mam hi Partha vyapashritya ye api syuh papayonayah Striyo vaisyas tatha shudras te 'pi yanti param gatim). The same is the Gita's authority for Gandhiji to fight against the Indian Caste-system. Who can say that Gandhiji is wrong here? The Gita presented its fresh Bhakti doctrine to fight against the Caste-system supported by the followers of the Jnana doctrine. In fact, the present day untouchable is not the one mentioned in the Manusmriti. The modern untouchable is the creation of the old society which was later than Manu.
Before I undertook the study, I was wondering and asking myself as to how far, we in India, have understood the secret of and real greatness of Mahatma Gandhi. After this study I have realized that very few of us know the secret of and his real greatness; he is far greater a man than we know him to be; very few of us understand him. The following pages are my humble effort to understand and evaluate the Mahatma in the light of a basic, fixed problem. It is again for the worthy reader to judge how far I have succeeded in my effort.
During the course of my study, I prepared two questionnaires one for the devotees of and scholars on Gandhism, another for scholars of Sanskrit and Vedanta. I am grateful to all those scholars who discussed with me or answered my questionnaires. Their views have been of immense help to me in the evaluation of my own conclusions. I should particularly refer to Shri Kakasaheb Kalelkar, Shri Dolarrai Mankad, Late Shri Maganbhai Desai, Shri Chhaganlal Joshi, Dr. T.N. Dave, Dr. G.K. Bhat, Dr. P.M. Modi, and Prof. J.J. Pandya.
Dr. P.M. Modi and Prof. J.J. Pandya-two prominent scholars on Vedanta in general and the Gita in particular-took keen interest in my work and gave valuable suggestions during the course of my study and preparation of the work. No words of thankfulness can reward.
their love and regard for me and for my work. In the end, I may take an appreciating note of the work of the assistants who took extracts, prepared copies, prepared the Bibliography etc., as I instructed them. With this, I submit my work to the judgment of the worthy reader and that too with the deep, genuine and humble feeling that:
आपरितोपाद्विदुषां न साधु मन्ये प्रयोगविज्ञानम् ।
**Contents and Sample Pages**